What was one way in which black argues against the majority opinion

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Chief Justice Roger Taney declared that African Americans, free or enslaved, were not considered citizens of the United States and therefore had no rights under the Constitution. In response, John S. Rock, a black attorney, argued that the Constitution of the United States provided African Americans with the same rights as white citizens and that the court should recognize their right to citizenship. Rock argued that the court should recognize that African Americans had the right to be considered citizens, just like any other person born in the United States.

Explanation

The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision is an important case in U.S. history as it set a legal precedent which denied African Americans the rights of citizenship. The decision was a major factor in deepening the rift between the North and the South and was a major factor in the outbreak of the Civil War. It also reinforced the view that African Americans were not citizens and had few, if any, rights.

The legacy of this decision still affects the rights of African Americans today. Despite the 14th Amendment granting African Americans the right to citizenship, the legacy of this decision still affects the way African Americans are treated in society. This includes issues such as racial profiling, police brutality, unequal access to education, and unequal access to economic opportunities.

In addition, the Dred Scott decision had a major impact on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution. The ruling established the principle of “separate but equal” which was used to justify racial segregation in public places until it was struck down in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. This ruling was an important milestone in the civil rights movement and is an example of how the Supreme Court can be used to protect the rights of citizens.