Hello,
Sign up to join our community!
Sign up to join our community!
Please sign in to your account!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What actions did King Charles I take that resulted in the dissolution of Parliament in 1629?
King Charles I dissolved Parliament in 1629 because he was not successful in negotiating with the members of Parliament on matters such as increased royal authority, religion and taxation. The King had attempted to impose a more 'absolutist' style of government and to force the Church of England toRead more
King Charles I dissolved Parliament in 1629 because he was not successful in negotiating with the members of Parliament on matters such as increased royal authority, religion and taxation. The King had attempted to impose a more ‘absolutist’ style of government and to force the Church of England to conform to his religious beliefs. He had also attempted to pass a number of unpopular taxes, all of which were met with resistance from Parliament. In response, the King dissolved Parliament, a move which ultimately led to the English Civil War.
Explanation
The answer given above highlights the importance of the actions taken by King Charles I in 1629 which ultimately led to the English Civil War. This event had a major impact on England, as it resulted in the execution of the King, the abolition of the monarchy, and the dissolution of the Church of England. Additionally, it resulted in a period of economic decline and increased taxation, as well as a period of social unrest and disorder.
Understanding the importance of the English Civil War and its implications is key to understanding the history of the United States. It was the English Civil War which resulted in the migration of many English people to the North American colonies. It was also the English Civil War which established the Commonwealth of England, a period of republican government in England and Wales which lasted until 1660. This period of government directly influenced the development of the U.S. government and the U.S. Constitution.
The English Civil War also had a major impact on the development of religious freedom in the United States. The dissolution of the Church of England and the establishment of the Commonwealth of England meant that religious freedom was established in England and Wales. This had an indirect impact on the establishment of religious freedom in the United States, as many of the American colonists had English roots.
Finally, the English Civil War had a major impact on the development of democracy in the United States. The period of republican government established by the Commonwealth of England directly influenced the development of democracy in the United States, as many of the American colonists had English roots. This is why the development of democracy in the United States is often referred to as the ‘American Revolution’.
See lessWhy do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents
Justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents to give their decisions context and to explain why their decisions are fair and just. Precedents are rulings from previous cases that set a standard and create consistency in the law. By referencing precedents, justices can demonstrate why thRead more
Justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents to give their decisions context and to explain why their decisions are fair and just. Precedents are rulings from previous cases that set a standard and create consistency in the law. By referencing precedents, justices can demonstrate why their decisions are in line with previous cases and therefore with the law.
Explanation
The answer above explains why justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents. Precedents are rulings from previous cases that set a standard and create consistency in the law. By referencing these precedents, justices can demonstrate why their decisions are in line with previous cases and therefore with the law.
The use of precedents is an important tool in helping justices make decisions that are fair and just. Justices are able to look back to previous cases to see what the law says about a particular issue, and to determine if the current case should be judged similarly. Without the use of precedents, justices would have to make decisions without any guidance from previous cases, which could lead to inconsistencies in the law.
The use of precedents also helps create clarity and predictability in the law. If a precedent has been set in a previous case, future cases that have similar facts and circumstances can be decided in the same way. This helps to ensure that people know what to expect from the law, as well as providing guidance to attorneys and judges when they are making decisions.
It’s important to note that justices do not always follow precedents. Justices have the power to decide which precedents to follow and which to reject. They may choose to reject a precedent if it is outdated or if it is not applicable to the case at hand. This allows justices to make decisions that are more in line with the current trends in the law and the underlying principles that the previous cases were based upon.
See less