One of the most common disagreements between African American leaders during the 1960s civil rights movement was the debate between those who believed in nonviolent protest and those who felt that more militant action was necessary in order to achieve real progress. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most prominent advocates of nonviolent protest, while Malcolm X was one of the most vocal proponents of militant action.

Explanation

The disagreement between advocates of nonviolent protest and those who favored more militant action during the civil rights movement was an important debate that had far-reaching implications. The strategy chosen by African American leaders during this time would determine the success or failure of their efforts to secure equal rights and opportunities for African Americans.

Nonviolent protests such as sit-ins, boycotts, and marches were effective in drawing attention to the civil rights movement and its goals. These tactics also allowed African American leaders to take a stand against injustice without resorting to violence, and they helped to create a broader public awareness of the plight of African Americans in the U.S.

Militant action such as the Black Panther Party was also effective in raising awareness of the civil rights movement, and it allowed African American leaders to take a stand against injustice in a more direct and aggressive manner. However, these tactics could also be counterproductive and lead to further violence and unrest.

The importance of the answer given above is that it demonstrates the importance of understanding the consequences of choosing either a nonviolent or a militant approach to the civil rights movement. This disagreement between African American leaders was ultimately a question of strategy and one that had long-term implications for how the civil rights movement was ultimately viewed and remembered.