The human rights record of the president of the United States is determined by the actions taken during the president’s term in office. For example, President Barack Obama was widely praised for his actions to end the U.S. policy of torture, while President Donald Trump has been widely criticized for his hardline immigration policies.

Explanation

The answer given above is important because it highlights the differences in the human rights record of two U.S. presidents. The actions taken by President Obama and President Trump have had very different impacts on the rights of individuals in the United States and around the world.

President Obama’s actions to end the U.S. policy of torture and strengthen the ban on torture are important because they demonstrate a commitment to upholding the rights of individuals and protecting them from harm. President Trump’s hardline immigration policies, however, have been widely criticized for their impact on the rights of immigrants and refugees. These policies have been seen as discriminatory, inhumane, and a violation of the rights of individuals.

The implications of this answer are far-reaching. For example, President Obama’s actions to end the policy of torture have set an important precedent, demonstrating that the U.S. government is committed to respecting human rights and protecting individuals from harm. President Trump’s policies, on the other hand, have been seen as an attack on the rights of immigrants and refugees, which has had a detrimental impact on the rights of individuals around the world.

By understanding the differences in the human rights records of President Obama and President Trump, students can gain a better understanding of the importance of respecting and protecting human rights. They can also gain a better understanding of the implications of a government’s policies and actions on the rights of individuals.