Hello,
Sign up to join our community!
Sign up to join our community!
Please sign in to your account!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Which action can Congress not perform according to the Constitution
Congress cannot pass a bill of attainder, ex post facto laws, or suspend the writ of habeas corpus. Explanation The three actions that Congress cannot perform according to the Constitution are important to protect the rights of citizens. A bill of attainder ensures that individuals cannot be declareRead more
Congress cannot pass a bill of attainder, ex post facto laws, or suspend the writ of habeas corpus.
Explanation
The three actions that Congress cannot perform according to the Constitution are important to protect the rights of citizens.
A bill of attainder ensures that individuals cannot be declared guilty without a trial. This is important to protect the right to due process and ensure that everyone is treated fairly and is given a chance to defend themselves in court.
An ex post facto law prevents laws from being applied retroactively. This is important to ensure that citizens cannot be punished for something they did before it was declared illegal.
The writ of habeas corpus prevents people from being held indefinitely without a trial. This is important to protect citizens against arbitrary detentions and ensure that everyone is given a chance to have their case heard in court.
When these rights are not protected, citizens are at risk of having their rights violated. This could lead to wrongful convictions, unfair punishments, and arbitrary detentions. Therefore, it is important for Congress to abide by the Constitution and not pass bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, or suspend the writ of habeas corpus.
See lessWhat was one of the purposes of President Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address
One of the purposes of President Lincoln's Gettysburg Address was to honor those who died in the Battle of Gettysburg and to commemorate the sacrifices made by the Union soldiers. Explanation The Gettysburg Address was an important speech in American history, as it helped to define the American valuRead more
One of the purposes of President Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address was to honor those who died in the Battle of Gettysburg and to commemorate the sacrifices made by the Union soldiers.
Explanation
The Gettysburg Address was an important speech in American history, as it helped to define the American values of democracy and freedom. The speech reminded the nation of the importance of equality, the need to protect and preserve the Union, and the sacrifices made by the Union soldiers. By honoring those who had died in the Battle of Gettysburg, Lincoln was emphasizing the importance of the Union and the need to protect it.
The speech also reinforced the idea of the ‘new birth of freedom’, which was a concept popularized by Lincoln that advocated for the civil rights of all citizens. This concept was important in the fight for civil rights, as it showed how the Union could be a place where all people were treated equally.
The implications of the Gettysburg Address extend far beyond the Civil War era. The ideas of equality, democracy, and the need to protect the Union remain relevant today. The idea of a ‘new birth of freedom’ is still important, as it serves as a reminder that all citizens deserve to be treated as equals, and that we must continue to fight for civil rights. This speech has also served as an inspiration for many people over the years, and continues to be an important part of American history.
See lessIn Katz v. US the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a public phone without a warrant. Identify one way in which the case is legally significant.
Katz v. United States (1967) is legally significant because it was the first Supreme Court case to recognize that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain areas and that the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures apply to those areas. ExplanaRead more
Katz v. United States (1967) is legally significant because it was the first Supreme Court case to recognize that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain areas and that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures apply to those areas.
Explanation
The Katz v. United States (1967) case is significant because it established the precedent that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain spaces, even if those spaces are open to the public, such as a telephone booth. This means that the government cannot search or seize the contents of those spaces without a warrant or cause, which is protected by the Fourth Amendment.
This precedent has implications for how we live our lives today. It ensures that our personal information, houses, papers, and effects are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It also sets a limit on how far the government can go in gathering evidence, which helps ensure that our rights are not violated.
This case is also related to other cases that have been litigated in the past, such as the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio (1961), which established the exclusionary rule. This rule states that evidence obtained through an illegal search or seizure cannot be used in a criminal trial. The Katz v. US case reinforces the importance of this rule, as it reinforces the idea that law enforcement must follow the Fourth Amendment and obtain a warrant or cause before searching or seizing someone’s property.
See lessPaul Robeson believed whites would see African Americans as equals if whites understood African American
Paul Robeson was an African American actor, singer, and civil rights activist who believed that if white Americans were exposed to African American culture, they would come to recognize African Americans as equals. He worked to promote African American culture through his film roles and musical perfRead more
Paul Robeson was an African American actor, singer, and civil rights activist who believed that if white Americans were exposed to African American culture, they would come to recognize African Americans as equals. He worked to promote African American culture through his film roles and musical performances, as well as by giving speeches and advocating for civil rights.
Explanation
Paul Robeson was an important figure in African American history, as he was a civil rights activist who advocated for equal rights for African Americans. He believed that if white Americans were exposed to African American culture, they would come to recognize African Americans as equals. He worked to promote African American culture through his film roles and musical performances, as well as through speeches and advocacy.
Paul Robeson’s work was key in the push for civil rights in the United States. By speaking out against racism and segregation, he helped to raise awareness of the plight of African Americans, and his efforts paved the way for increased civil rights for African Americans in the United States.
The importance of Paul Robeson’s work is seen in the fact that he was willing to risk his career to stand up for the rights of African Americans. His efforts helped to create a more equal and just society, and his legacy is still seen today in the struggle for civil rights and racial justice.
The student should also consider the implications of Paul Robeson’s work on today’s society. The fight for equality and civil rights is still ongoing, and it is important for students to understand the historical context of this struggle. Students should consider how Paul Robeson’s work was instrumental in the push for civil rights, and how this legacy continues to shape the world today.
See less