Hello,

Sign up to join our community!

Welcome Back,

Please sign in to your account!

Forgot Password,

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

You must login to ask a question.

You must login to ask a question.

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

  1. During the French Revolution (1789–1799), the diet of the common people in France largely consisted of bread, vegetables, and some meat. Bread, in particular, was a staple food for the French, with an estimated consumption of over 2 pounds per day per person. Common vegetables included cabbage, turnRead more

    During the French Revolution (1789–1799), the diet of the common people in France largely consisted of bread, vegetables, and some meat. Bread, in particular, was a staple food for the French, with an estimated consumption of over 2 pounds per day per person. Common vegetables included cabbage, turnips, and onions. Meat was more expensive and was usually eaten only a few times a week, with more affluent families consuming more meat than the poorer ones. Other foods consumed during the French Revolution included fish, cheese, eggs, and fruit.

    Explanation

    The answer given above provides an important insight into what life was like for the common people in France during the French Revolution. The types of food consumed provide important insight into the socio-economic status of the people, as well as their access to food. For example, wealthier families had access to more expensive cuts of meat, while poorer families had to make do with whatever they could afford.

    In addition to providing insight into the types of food consumed during the French Revolution, this answer also provides insight into the overall nutrition of the population during this time. Bread was a staple food and a major source of carbohydrates, but other sources of important nutrients such as protein, fat, vitamins and minerals were limited. This could have had a major impact on the health of the population, leading to increased rates of malnutrition and disease.

    It is also important to consider the implications of the French Revolution on the food supply of France. The Revolution marked a period of political instability, which could have had a major impact on the ability of people to access food. In addition, the upheaval of the Revolution led to the destruction of many farms and farmlands, which could have further impacted the food supply of the population.

    See less
  2. The Roundheads were a political and religious group during the English Civil War (1642-1651). They were supporters of Parliament and its Puritan religious reforms, and were opposed to the Royalists and their absolutist stance. The Roundheads were led by Oliver Cromwell, who commanded a professionalRead more

    The Roundheads were a political and religious group during the English Civil War (1642-1651). They were supporters of Parliament and its Puritan religious reforms, and were opposed to the Royalists and their absolutist stance. The Roundheads were led by Oliver Cromwell, who commanded a professional army of Puritan soldiers. The Roundheads were known for their strict religious beliefs, their support of Parliament, and their opposition to monarchy in England.

    Explanation

    The Roundheads were a crucial part of the English Civil War, and their victory was an important milestone in the history of England and the world. Their victory led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy in England, with Parliament having more power and authority than the monarchy. This laid the groundwork for democracy in England, which later spread throughout the world.

    The Roundheads’ religious beliefs also had a lasting impact on England and the world. Their Puritan values, such as hard work, self-discipline, and a commitment to education, are still seen in many parts of the world today.

    The Roundheads’ victory also has implications for other countries around the world. It serves as a reminder that democracy is a fragile system and can be overturned if the people do not have a say in their government. This is why it is important to have strong checks and balances between the government and the people in order to prevent tyranny.

    See less
  3. The historical figure who single-handedly defended a bridge during a time of Roman attack was Horatius Cocles. This event had a major impact on Roman history. It was a major victory for Rome and had a lasting psychological impact on their enemies, helping to secure Rome as a major power in the regioRead more

    The historical figure who single-handedly defended a bridge during a time of Roman attack was Horatius Cocles. This event had a major impact on Roman history. It was a major victory for Rome and had a lasting psychological impact on their enemies, helping to secure Rome as a major power in the region. It also helped to solidify the concept of a strong Roman Republic, which was later the basis for the Roman Empire.

    Explanation

    The story of Horatius Cocles is an important one in Roman history because it demonstrates the strength and courage of the Roman Republic. Horatius’ brave defense of the bridge helped to secure Rome as a major power in the region, and it also helped to solidify the concept of a strong Roman Republic. This concept of a strong Roman Republic was later the basis for the Roman Empire, which dominated much of the known world for centuries.

    The Battle of Lake Regillus and the victory over the Sabines were also very important in the history of Rome. These battles and conquests helped to expand Rome’s influence in the region and allowed Rome to become the dominant power in the area.

    The ballads and poems that were written about Horatius’ heroic deed also helped to spread his story throughout Rome and beyond. This helped to cement his legacy as a hero of Rome and made him an important figure in the history of the Roman Republic. It also inspired other Romans to be brave and courageous, which helped Rome to continue to be a powerful and influential force in the region.

    See less
  4. The origin of the spit handshake is uncertain, but some believe it originated in the 1920s as a way to show trust between people. The idea is that when two people spit into their hands and shake, the spit becomes a physical symbol of the trust between them. Explanation The origin of the spit handshaRead more

    The origin of the spit handshake is uncertain, but some believe it originated in the 1920s as a way to show trust between people. The idea is that when two people spit into their hands and shake, the spit becomes a physical symbol of the trust between them.

    Explanation

    The origin of the spit handshake is an important part of understanding the significance of the gesture today. The handshake is a way of showing trust between two people, and it is thought to have originated in the 1920s. This is important because it shows that the handshake has been used as a sign of trust for centuries.

    In addition to the origin of the spit handshake, it is also important to consider the implications of the gesture. The handshake is a physical symbol of trust, and it is often used to demonstrate loyalty or commitment between two people. It can also be used to show respect, friendship, and camaraderie.

    The spit handshake also has implications for the ways in which people interact. It is a physical gesture that allows two people to connect without having to say anything, and it can be used to create a bond between two people. It is important to consider the implications of the handshake because it can have a profound effect on relationships.

    Finally, it is important to consider the cultural implications of the handshake. In some cultures, the handshake is a sign of respect and trust, while in others it is seen as offensive. It is important to be aware of the cultural implications of the gesture when using it in different contexts.

    See less