Primary sources are documents or other types of evidence that were created at the time of an event or period in history. Examples of primary sources include letters, photographs, diaries, newspaper articles, interviews, artifacts, and works of art. Secondary sources are interpretations of primary sources. They include textbooks, encyclopedias, and articles written about a certain event or period. Historians can also use archaeological evidence such as fossils, artifacts, and ruins to gain insight into life before written records were kept.

Explanation

The answer given above is important because it provides a detailed overview of the types of sources available to historians to gain insight into life before written records were kept. Archaeological evidence such as fossils, artifacts, and ruins can provide a window into the past, allowing historians to piece together the history of a region or people. Primary sources such as letters, photographs, diaries, newspaper articles, interviews, artifacts, and works of art can provide valuable information about life before written records were kept. Secondary sources such as textbooks, encyclopedias, and articles written about a certain event or period can help to further interpret the primary sources.

It is important to note that archaeological evidence, primary sources, and secondary sources can all provide valuable information, but they must be used in combination to gain a comprehensive understanding of life before written records were kept. For example, archaeological evidence can provide a physical context for the events of the past, while primary and secondary sources can provide more detailed information about the people and culture of the time.

Using primary and secondary sources to gain insight into life before written records were kept can be a complex and time-consuming process, as historians must carefully analyze and interpret the evidence in order to draw meaningful conclusions. As such, it is important for historians to be familiar with the methods used to analyze and interpret sources, and to be aware of the implications and consequences of their interpretations.

The Mayflower Compact was signed to increase colonists’ access to resources from the Wampanoag people

Explanation

The Mayflower Compact was an important document that shaped the foundations of American democracy. By signing this agreement, the colonists created the first form of self-government in the New World, setting the stage for the development of the United States.

The provisions of the Mayflower Compact would go on to influence later documents, such as the Articles of Confederation, which established the first unified government of the 13 American colonies. This document also helped to set the precedent for the U.S. Constitution, which would later be written to create a federal government for the newly formed United States.

The answer given above explains that the Mayflower Compact was not signed to increase colonists’ access to resources from the Wampanoag people. This is important because the Mayflower Compact was created to establish rules and regulations to ensure that the colonists would be able to govern themselves, and not to gain access to resources.

In addition to understanding the importance of the answer given, it is also important to discuss the implications and consequences of the Mayflower Compact. The Mayflower Compact helped to create the basis for the future government of the United States, and it established a system of self-government that would shape the development of the country for centuries to come.