How did Marcus Garvey’s approach to civil rights differ from that of the NAACP

Marcus Garvey’s approach to civil rights was focused on creating separate institutions and a sense of racial pride and self-empowerment for African Americans. He sought to create a nation for African Americans in Africa and his organization, the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), was dedicated to purchasing land in Africa and creating a new nation. In contrast, the NAACP was focused on civil rights and equality within the existing framework of American society. They sought desegregation and civil rights reforms such as anti-lynching laws and voting rights protections.

Explanation

The answer provided outlines how the approaches to civil rights by Marcus Garvey and the NAACP differed. It is important for students to understand these differences as they illustrate two distinct approaches to the civil rights movement. Marcus Garvey’s approach was focused on creating a separate nation for African Americans in Africa and promoting racial pride and self-empowerment. The NAACP, on the other hand, sought desegregation and civil rights reforms such as anti-lynching laws and voting rights protections.

It is also important to discuss the implications and consequences of these different approaches. Marcus Garvey’s approach led to a sense of empowerment and pride among African Americans, but it was also met with criticism and resistance from those who wanted to maintain the status quo. The NAACP’s approach was more successful in achieving desegregation and civil rights reforms, but it also had its critics who argued that it was too slow and not radical enough. Both approaches had their benefits and drawbacks, and understanding them helps us better understand the history of the civil rights movement in the United States.