How did the Supreme court act during the Harding presidency

The Harding administration saw several important Supreme Court decisions that favored business interests and limited federal government power. These decisions included the Adkins v. Children’s Hospital case which declared the federal minimum wage law unconstitutional, the Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Company case which declared child labor laws unconstitutional, and the Myers v. United States case which limited the president’s power to remove executive branch officials.

Explanation

The Supreme Court decisions during the Harding presidency had a major impact on the American economy and labor force. By overturning the federal minimum wage law, the Adkins v. Children’s Hospital decision limited the government’s ability to regulate wages and working conditions, resulting in lower wages and poorer working conditions for many workers. Similarly, the Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Company decision limited the government’s ability to regulate child labor, allowing employers to take advantage of the labor of children and young people. The Myers v. United States decision limited the president’s power to remove executive branch officials, reducing the accountability of the executive branch and allowing for greater corruption.

The decisions of the Supreme Court during the Harding presidency had long-term implications for labor and government power. The rulings made it easier for businesses to get away with lower wages and poorer working conditions, leading to greater inequality in the workforce. The limitations placed on the government’s power to regulate labor and the executive branch also led to more corruption and mismanagement in government.