How does justice black support the dissenting opinion
Sign up to join our community!
Please sign in to your account!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Justice Black wrote in his dissenting opinion that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment guarantees that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. He argued that this clause means that the government is prohibited from passing laws or enacting measures that support or favor one religion over another.
Explanation
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is an extremely important part of the 1st Amendment as it prevents the government from enacting laws that favor or establish one religion over another. This clause is essential in preserving religious freedom in the United States and protecting citizens from religious discrimination.
Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in the case of the Pledge of Allegiance was extremely important as it highlighted the importance of the Establishment Clause and its relation to the Pledge of Allegiance. The opinion brought to light the fact that the Pledge of Allegiance was in violation of the Establishment Clause, as it was an explicit endorsement of a monotheistic religion.
The implications of Justice Black’s opinion are far-reaching. It helped to establish the precedent of the government being prohibited from enacting laws that favor one religion over another. This helped to further religious freedom in the United States and protect citizens from religious discrimination. Additionally, the opinion was the basis for the decision to ultimately remove the phrase “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
by giving an example of how mary beth tinker did, in fact, disrupt her mathematics class
By giving an example of how Mary Beth Tinker did, in fact, disrupt her mathematics class
-Apex
By pointing out that people under 18 and 21 are already barred from certain rights
By giving an example of how Mary Beth Tinker did, in fact, disrupt her mathematics class
Waugh v. Mississippi University case about protests in fraternities
by referring to the Waugh v Mississippi university case about protests in fraternities