What statement would a Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint most likely agree with

A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree with the statement that courts should only rule on cases that require interpretation of law and should not make rulings on social or political issues.

Explanation

Judicial restraint is an important principle in the American legal system because it helps to ensure that the power of the Supreme Court is limited to matters that require interpretation of the law and does not extend to making rulings on social or political issues. This helps to protect the separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches of government, as well as preventing the Supreme Court from overstepping its bounds and making decisions that should be left to the other branches of government.

By limiting the power of the Supreme Court to matters that require interpretation of the law, judicial restraint helps to prevent the court from making rulings that could have unintended consequences or that may be seen as biased or influenced by political or social interests. This helps to ensure that the court’s decisions are based on the rule of law, rather than on personal opinions or beliefs.

Understanding the importance of judicial restraint is important for students of the American legal system because it helps them to understand the limits of the Supreme Court’s power and the importance of the separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches of government. It also helps them understand the importance of interpreting the law without bias and without allowing personal opinions or beliefs to influence their decision-making.