Sign up to join our community!
Please sign in to your account!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What type of relationship developed between the colonies and their managers in England that led to the colonists feeling free to develop as they saw fit
You must login to add an answer.
The relationship between the colonists and their managers in England was a distant one. The relationship was based on a trust that the colonists would manage their own affairs and would not interfere with the interests of England. The colonists felt free to develop their own laws and systems of governance as they saw fit, without direct interference from England.
Explanation
The answer given above is important because it highlights the distant relationship between the colonists and their managers in England, which allowed the colonists to develop their own laws and systems of governance without interference from England. This autonomy allowed the colonists to develop their own culture and identity, which eventually led to their grievances against England and the American Revolution.
The Proclamation of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774 were important documents that influenced how the colonists felt about their autonomy. The Proclamation of 1763 limited the colonists’ ability to settle west of the Appalachian Mountains, while the Quebec Act gave the Quebecois greater freedom in their religious and civil practices. These documents demonstrate England’s attempt to give the colonists a sense of autonomy, which eventually led to their resentment of England’s control.
The American Revolution was a direct result of the colonists’ grievances against England. The Revolution is a prime example of the consequences of a distant relationship between the colonists and their managers in England, and how a lack of autonomy can lead to a desire for freedom and independence. The American Revolution was a major event in history, and it is important for students to understand the implications and consequences of the answer given above.
British North American colonies were more often than not administered on the basis of “indirect rule” from London. As such, the colonies were largely self-governed and answered to charter holders and company owners rather than the British Crown. Laws and taxes passed in the homeland by Parliament were made exceedingly more lenient when applied to the colonies, and some were not even enforced at all.
In the United States, such a relationship between the former Thirteen Colonies and Great Britain is known as salutary neglect (salutary meaning “benevelont”). It is generally accepted by contemporary historians that this practice of neglect stemming from indirect rule was intentional, as British authorities sought to reduce the administration costs associated with running a colony directly.
Salutary negelct and self-governance were two of the key concepts that allowed the colonies to develop on their own, free from intervention by the Crown. Indeed, colonists became accustomed to the idea of “self-determination” and the practices (along with British democratic tradition) are usually associated with the birth of American democratic ideals.