Which diagram best explains a cause and effect relationship that has shaped US politics
Sign up to join our community!
Please sign in to your account!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Domino Theory is a political diagram that explains a cause and effect relationship that has shaped US politics. It was used by the US during the Cold War to describe the potential for the spread of Communism from one nation to another. The theory suggests that if one nation falls to Communism, the neighboring nations would also fall like a row of dominoes.
Explanation
The Domino Theory is an important concept to understand when studying US politics. It was used to explain the potential spread of Communism during the Cold War, and it was used to justify US involvement in the Vietnam War and other interventions. The Domino Theory was also used to support anti-Communist governments and coups in Latin America.
The Domino Theory is important to understand, because it shaped US foreign policy for several decades. It had a major impact on US-led interventions in other countries and the US decision to support anti-Communist governments.
However, some scholars argue that the “Trickle Down Theory” is a more accurate way of understanding the spread of Communism. This theory suggests that the spread of Communism is more likely to be gradual and is more likely to occur in countries with weak governments and economies.
Understanding the implications of the Domino Theory is important when studying US foreign policy. It helps us understand why the US was involved in certain interventions and why the US supported certain governments. It is also important to consider the criticisms of the Domino Theory and the competing theories that have been proposed. Knowing this can help us better understand the US foreign policy decisions of the past and the potential consequences of US interventions in the future.
Long-established party loyalties**–(have contributed to)—->** The persistence of the two-party system
Winner-takes-all elections> The dominance of the two major parties
restrictions on who can receive public campaign funds —->the persistence of the two-part system